Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalia Siedliska vs Natalie Proese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siedliska vs Proese analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalia Siedliska vs Natalie Proese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siedliska 2 - 1 Proese
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siedliska has won 43.06% of points on their second serve, while Proese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siedliska, in recent form, has won 60.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Proese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.22% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siedliska has saved 64.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Proese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siedliska has won 50% of matches played (W/L 15/ 15), with Proese winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siedliska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Proese has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Siedliska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Proese has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Siedliska winning 2 times and Proese being victorious 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Siedliska winning 5 and Proese winning 4. The last match between Siedliska and Proese was at the W25 Darmstadt, 24-06-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Natalia Siedliska getting the victory 6-3 3-6 16-14.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siedliska and Proese have played a deciding set 3 times, with Siedliska winning 2 times and Proese 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Siedliska winning 0, and Proese 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siedliska has played against opponents with an average rank of 144.43 while Proese has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siedliska has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Proese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siedliska has converted 41.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Proese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
691
Rank
487
High
28
Age
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
726
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
57% (251-192)
Career Total W/L
41% (113-162)
40% (4-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Natalia Siedliska vs Natalie Proese For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Siedliska VS Proese
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Natalie Proese |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 4 |
| Games Won | 52 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (98/186) | 74% (120/162) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (71/98) | 55% (66/120) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (32/88) | 43% (18/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (10/16) | 40% (10/25) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (78/162) | 45% (83/186) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 16-14 | |||||
| 7-5 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Natalie Proese
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-1 2-6 6-3 |
Stats
Natalie Proese
Player
Natalia Siedliska
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
93)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
55%
(
36 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
52 of
93)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Natalie Proese |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (110/107) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 59.4 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (559/775) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (317/559) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (93/216) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (46/111) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (343/724) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Natalia Siedliska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Felitsata Dorofeeva-Rybas
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
91%
(
80 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Yasmine Wagner
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Natalia Siedliska
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Siedliska
78%
(
76 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yifan Sun
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalie Proese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Natalie Proese
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eline Audenaert
Player
Natalie Proese
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Proese
Player
Natea Bizet
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Natalie Proese
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Natalie Proese
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Siedliska Vs Proese Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Siedliska are available here and Proese photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
